Retour à la liste des publications

What is The two states solution abnd why Arabs have always rejected it ?

The idea of creating an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel—has been proposed at multiple key moments in history, often as a response to conflict or diplomatic opportunities. 

1. Pre-1948: Early Proposals

A. 1937 – Peel Commission (British Mandate)

  • Context: Arab-Jewish violence (1936–39 Arab Revolt) prompted Britain to seek a solution.
  • Proposal:
    • Partition Palestine into:
      • A Jewish state (Galilee, coastal plain).
      • An Arab state (West Bank, Gaza, Negev).
      • British control over Jerusalem and a corridor to the Mediterranean.
    • Population transfer: Proposed moving 225,000 Palestinians out of the Jewish state (controversial even then).
  • Reactions:
    • Jewish Agency: Accepted in principle (but debated borders).
    • Arab Leaders: Rejected outright (seen as betrayal; demanded all of Palestine).
  • Outcome: Failed—Britain abandoned it due to Arab opposition.

B. 1947 – UN Partition Plan (Resolution 181)

  • Context: Post-WWII, Britain referred Palestine to the UN. Holocaust survivors sought refuge.
  • Proposal (Nov 29, 1947):
    • Jewish state: 55% of land (though Jews were 30% of population).
    • Arab state: 45% (including West Bank, Gaza, Jaffa).
    • Jerusalem: International city.
  • Reactions:
    • Jewish Agency: Accepted.
    • Arab States/Palestinians: Rejected; saw it as unfair land division.
  • Outcome:
    • 1948 War (Nakba): Arab states invaded; Israel won, expanded beyond UN borders.
    • No Palestinian state created; Jordan took West Bank, Egypt took Gaza.

2. Post-1967: Occupation and Negotiations

A. 1967 – After the Six-Day War

  • Context: Israel captured West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, Golan Heights, Sinai.
  • Proposal:
    • UN Security Council Resolution 242 (Nov 1967): Called for Israeli withdrawal from "territories occupied" in exchange for peace and recognition.
    • Implicit two-state idea: Land for peace, but didn’t explicitly mention Palestinian statehood.
  • Reactions:
    • Israel: Accepted land for peace but refused full withdrawal.
    • Arab States: Initially rejected (Khartoum Summit: "No peace, no recognition, no negotiations").

B. 1970s–1980s: Shifts in Palestinian Leadership

  • 1974 – PLO’s "Phased Plan":
    • Yasser Arafat’s Fatah proposed a two-stage strategy:
      1. National authority in any liberated territory (e.g., West Bank/Gaza).
      2. Later, full liberation of Palestine.
    • First implicit PLO acceptance of a temporary two-state reality.
  • 1988 – Palestinian Declaration of Independence:
    • Algeria Summit: PLO officially accepted two states (Nov 15, 1988).
    • Recognized Israel’s right to exist (implicitly) and declared a State of Palestine in the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem.
    • Reactions:
      • Israel: Rejected (PM Yitzhak Shamir called it a "tactical move").
      • U.S.: Engaged PLO (led to Oslo Process).

3. 1990s: The Oslo Accords Era

A. 1993 – Oslo I Accord

  • Context: Secret negotiations in Norway; PLO recognized Israel, Israel recognized PLO.
  • Proposal:
    • Palestinian Authority (PA) to govern Gaza and Jericho first, then West Bank.
    • Final status issues (borders, Jerusalem, refugees) delayed.
  • Reactions:
    • Palestinians: Split—Fatah supported, Hamas/Islamic Jihad rejected.
    • Israel: Rabbi Yitzhak Rabin signed; right-wing opposition (e.g., future PM Netanyahu called it a "danger").
  • Outcome:
    • PA established (1994); limited self-rule in Gaza/Jericho.
    • Rabin assassinated (1995) by Israeli extremist; process stalled.

B. 2000 – Camp David Summit

  • Context: Clinton, Barak (Israel), Arafat (PA) met to finalize two states.
  • Proposal (reportedly):
    • Palestinian state on ~90% of West Bank, Gaza, and parts of East Jerusalem.
    • Land swaps to keep major Israeli settlement blocs.
    • No right of return for Palestinian refugees.
  • Reactions:
    • Arafat rejected (claimed offer was non-contiguous, Jerusalem deal weak).
    • Barak blamed Arafat; Palestinians said Israel’s map was "Swiss cheese."
  • Outcome: Failed; led to Second Intifada (2000–2005).

4. 2000s: Unilateral Moves and Collapse

A. 2005 – Israel’s Unilateral Disengagement from Gaza

  • Context: PM Ariel Sharon withdrew 8,000 settlers and troops from Gaza.
  • Proposal:
    • Not a two-state plan, but seen as a step toward separation.
    • West Bank settlements expanded simultaneously.
  • Reactions:
    • Palestinians: Saw it as incomplete (West Bank still occupied).
    • Israelis: Right-wing opposed; left-wing saw it as too little.
  • Outcome:
    • Hamas took Gaza (2007) after winning elections; blockade began.
    • Two-state idea faded as Gaza/West Bank split.

B. 2002 – Arab Peace Initiative

  • Context: Saudi Arabia proposed a regional deal.
  • Proposal:
    • Full normalization of Arab-Israel relations if Israel accepts:
      • Palestinian state on 1967 borders (with land swaps).
      • East Jerusalem as capital.
      • "Just solution" for refugees.
  • Reactions:
    • Israel: Rejected (no PM accepted it fully; Netanyahu called it a "non-starter").
    • Palestinians: Supported but lacked leverage.
  • Outcome: Still on the table but ignored.

5. 2010s–2020s: Decline of the Two-State Idea

A. 2009 – Netanyahu’s "Economic Peace"

  • Context: Netanyahu’s first term; rejected two states in Bar-Ilan speech (2009).
  • Proposal:
    • No Palestinian state; instead, economic improvements under occupation.
  • Outcome: Settlement expansion accelerated; PA lost credibility.

B. 2013–2014 – Kerry’s Peace Talks

  • Context: Secretary of State John Kerry pushed negotiations.
  • Proposal:
    • Two states based on 1967 borders with swaps.
    • Security arrangements: Palestinian state demilitarized; Israeli troops in Jordan Valley.
  • Reactions:
    • Netanyahu: Reluctant; demanded Palestinian recognition of Israel as "Jewish state."
    • Abbas (PA): Weakened; Hamas opposed talks.
  • Outcome: Collapsed after 9 months; 2014 Gaza War followed.

C. 2020 – Trump’s "Deal of the Century"

  • Context: Trump administration’s pro-Israel plan.
  • Proposal:
    • Palestinian "state" on ~70% of West Bank (fragmented).
    • Jerusalem as Israeli capital; Palestinian capital in Abu Dis (a suburb).
    • No right of return; settlements annexed.
  • Reactions:
    • Palestinians: Unanimously rejected.
    • Israel: Netanyahu supported; left-wing opposed.
  • Outcome: Dead on arrival; seen as one-state solution in disguise.

6. 2023–2025: Post-October 7 War

A. Current Status

  • Two-state solution is effectively dead per most analysts:
    • Israel:
      • Netanyahu’s government (2023–2025) rejects Palestinian statehood.
      • Smotrich/Ben-Gvir (far-right ministers) advocate annexation of West Bank.
    • Palestinians:
      • PA weakened (seen as corrupt; 80% of Palestinians want Abbas to resign).
      • Hamas (post-Oct 7) gains support; rejects two states.
    • International Community:
      • U.S./EU still pay lip service to two states but no serious push.
      • Arab states (e.g., Saudi Arabia) link normalization deals to Palestinian state—but no progress.

Ajouter un commentaire